<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel>
<title>Easy English Tips</title>
<link>http://www.blogigo.com/easyenglishtips</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<dc:creator>venkatchary</dc:creator>
<dc:publisher>venkatchary</dc:publisher>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:31:00 +0100</pubDate>
<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<item>
<title>Avoiding gender Language</title>
<description> 
 Word  choices and grammatical constructions that ignore or minimize the presence and  contributions of one sex in society—at home or school or the workplace, in  business or professional spheres, in social or personal relationships—may be  considered sexist. Many writers and speakers try to avoid such usages, and they  reject as well language that calls attention to the sex of an individual when  it is irrelevant to the role or situation under discussion. Here are specific  suggestions for avoiding sexist language, from replacing one term with another  to recasting sentences.  
 
 
 
	 
	 Replacing  man  or  men , or words       or expressions containing either, when they are clearly intended to refer       to a person of either sex or to include members of both sexes.  
 
 
 
 
	 
		 
			   Instead of   
			   Consider using   
		 
		 
			  man  
			  human being, human, person, individual 
			  
		 
		 
			  mankind, man (collectively)  
			  human beings, humans, humankind,...</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:31:00 +0100</pubDate>
<link>http://www.blogigo.com/easyenglishtips/Avoiding-gender-Language/1/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.blogigo.com/easyenglishtips/Avoiding-gender-Language/1/</guid>
</item></channel>	
</rss>